abortionKeep the Government out of my body!Monday, May 16, 2011 at 4:17 pm — admin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY-bQ6UzhNI South Dakota recently passed a bill requiring all women seeking abortions to wait 72 hours after seeing a physician and to obtain counseling from a Christian-based crisis pregnancy center. Can you imagine. Forced to hear some fool give you his/her opinion on what you should do with your body. Women are just THAT stupid, so they think. Why Does Liberal Dude Nation/Hollywood Insist on Keeping Women's Choice Locked in the Closet?Saturday, April 23, 2011 at 4:45 pm — admin
Do you ever get as sick of liberals using abortion as a political tool as I do? In the end, I've decided that, where once I voted based upon choice, I now understand that Democrats have no interest in ending the abortion wars. In fact, the Democrats would be sunk without the choice issue, in terms of their non-minority female vote. As proof of liberals disdain for socializing American in favor of choice... Oh the Irony of Selective Memory on SexismMonday, September 20, 2010 at 12:22 am — admin
Oh one has to laugh very hard and then cry when they read the Times these days. In a story on Carl P. Paladino, it is beyond absurd to hear reporter David M. Halbfinger say that the Democratic machine is going to attack Paladino--the Republican nominee for NY governor--for his "bigoted and pornographic" emails. By way of example of bigot the reporter points to Paladino's reference to NYAssembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, as the anti-christ. Obama is condemned for his anti-woman policy by women's rights groupsWednesday, July 21, 2010 at 12:40 am — admin
Obama just can't get enough of selling out women to safeguard his socialist agenda. From Center for Reproductive Rights:
What do the NYTimes and Operation Rescue have in common? Misogyny!Thursday, July 8, 2010 at 9:46 am — admin
In an effort to fire the flames of keeping abortion a political firestorm, the NYTimes but this story "Abortion Drugs Given in Iowa via Video Link" on its FRONT page. Nevermind the paper won't ever put A1 coverage of Barry's remaking of NASA into a Cultural Center vs its intended purpose of Exceptional US Technology--as we all know Barry thinks the days of US Exceptional ism are over. But back to the horrid decison to play political football with women's uteruses YET AGAIN, the Times continues to use the term "abortionist" in place of doctor in its coverage of abortion. Kagan, Yippee, sort of kindaSaturday, June 5, 2010 at 12:33 am — admin
So folks, we've been silent on Kagan. We are happy to see a third women on her way to The Court, BUT with Ginsberg's diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and a shaky outlook for Scary Barry in 2012, our money is on Ginsberg stepping down and then.... only IF Obama appoints another women to take her place will I give him an iota of credit. We most likely will see a return to the 20% rule that is the female condition. In reading about Kagan, it seems she exactly fits the Obama mold: extremely pro affirmative action and extremely ambivalent or perhaps a bit hostile to abortion rights. Enabled by ObamaCare, 29 States set to pass bans on Abortion coverageSunday, May 16, 2010 at 4:43 pm — admin
Where are the Left's calls for a boycott of Oklahoma?Monday, May 10, 2010 at 11:30 pm — admin
Last week we reported on the new Oklahoma law that does this:
Never mind the right to privacy issues the new law violates... the force crowd is in full swing in putting government into a woman's body and using coercive actions to undermine her right to self -determine what she does with her own body. |
|