The Executive Editor of the New York Times in 2008 was more than happy to use his pages to call Hillary a “white bitch” and write in disgust of her “cluelessness” while calling smiling about Obama’s “prowess” when Hillary was not a loyal helpmate to Obama, but now that Barack Hussein Obama is swimming in his own shit the vomit-inducing New York Times is begging the newly “loyal” helpmate that Hillary has become to Obama to jump in and save his Euro-Socialist black ass.

It is adorable to watch the liberals preen as the Republican Party shows some infighting over who to back to lead the party. As the Blue Dogs bite the tail off the Far Left Pelosi and Obama. Way funny. Nay, the libs have no infighting, other than...oh say this from Bob Obama Herbert in his paranoid 08 Seeds of Destruction back stab:

It wasn’t just the pardons that sullied the Clintons’ exit from the White House. They took furniture and rugs from the White House collection that had to be returned.
So class is not a Clinton forte.

During the primaries, it was nigh impossible to find a voice more tainted with rage about Hillary Clinton than Frank Rich—the misogynist columnist paid by the New York Times to go to combat against any woman who dares want for REAL power.
There is NO WAY, NO HOW that Master Rich would deign to write about a female in supreme power. No Way would he let THAT happen.
During the primary,

If ur dating Frank Rich and he’s talking the talk about stuff he thinks you want to hear, but only when it will get him a dick lick, NOT after he’s blown his “political capital” then ladies wizen up! YOU’ve BEEN HAD.

Here’s the thing: the media counts on women to be easily manipulated. This is not a post that says this woman or that is superior. This is a post to say, lets get smart about it. Gullibility in women is no asset, despite what the media and Hollywood sell us.