new york timesOccupy Wall Street champions Carl Richard’s breathtaking greed while expecting Tea Party folks pay off his debtSunday, December 18, 2011 at 6:05 pm — admin
Meet Carl Richards—part of the 99% who are directly responsible for the collapse of the housing market. They moan and bemoan those who let them feed at the trough. Really. Even my toddler knows that what Carl Richards did would not work out well and anyone with a more developed brain can see the likes of Richards got us into the housing mess and then the ultimate financial collapse. What did dumbot Richards do? Well it hurts to write it but here goes: He could afford a house that cost ~$350, 000 by his own reckoning but bought a home for $575,000. NYTimes Writer, Alissa J. Rubin downplays a lifetime of rape as a “custom” in Muslim landsWednesday, December 14, 2011 at 1:25 am — admin
The front page of the New York Times ran this header on Dec.2: "For Afghan Women, Justice Runs Into Unforgiving Wall of Custom." Custom? The story was about a woman put into prison because she was raped. The price of her freedom: a lifetime of being fucked by her rapist, as in... to get out of jail and gain her so-called freedom, she would have to marry her rapist. Calling this “Custom” is mad, insane really. And the rest of the story is a study in an Obama-like apology tour to the Muslim “customs” of female enslavement. Yet another Liberal Dude Nation’s perp walk of shame. Cheering for the dealth penalty can be the right thing to do. Just think Hayes & KomisarjevskyWednesday, September 21, 2011 at 8:32 pm — admin
I have a long-standing push pull with the death penality. Push DNA evidence exonerations; pull, every day stories like the one I am about to show you as well as the fact that having the dealth penalty on the table allows deals to be made to find locations of other remaining bodies, which in turn can help parents find some tiny shred of peace. The NYTimes likes to pretend that only mean ol' GOPers cheer for the dealth penalty, so let's travel now to see what some HuffPO liberals have to say about what to do with a child rapist: The New York Times ongoing bias against womenMonday, September 12, 2011 at 12:05 pm — admin
This week Salon ran a piece titled: Does "The Daily Show" still have a woman problem?--An exhibit illustrates the lack of women on influential talk shows -- even on Rachel Maddow and Terry Gross. You all may remember that post David Misogynist Letterman’s horrific rape jokes about Sarah Palin’s young daughter and calling Palin herself a slut, that FemiSex was the first to report that all the writers on Letterman’s show are males. Dollars to doughnuts they still are all males. New York Times begs liberals to stop dissing Teh One and says no more Hillary talk!Monday, August 22, 2011 at 10:51 am — admin
Memo from Jill Abramson, executive editor of the New York Times, to her staff editors: Dear Staff a disturbing trend is emerging where the liberal media is printing What If stories about Hillary Clinton. You know, "what if the liberal media hadn't swooned over an untested non-experienced empty suit that is Obama" type of story as they also wonder what if the New York Times had not decided to label Hillary as a "white bitch" and call her a "racist" and what if Hillary had been president. NYTimes completely out of touch with realityWednesday, June 29, 2011 at 2:29 pm — admin
On the wave of passing a property tax cap, new Gov. Andrew "Cuomo gets the support of 75 percent of Democrats surveyed for the new poll, as well as 61 percent of New York independents. Even among Republicans, he gets the support of the majority – 53 percent approve, while 26 percent disapprove."~Politico On Thurs. May 26th, the NYTimes said that "a 2 percent property tax cap is a cheap political tool." Gail Collins, Mitch Daniels, Yellow Journalism and back to the 50s where divorce is verbotenMonday, May 23, 2011 at 1:05 pm — admin
This past Friday we wrote this post: Obama won by unsealing the secrets of foes' marriages; the NYTimes wants to do that same in 2012. In it, FemiSex outlined the NYT's Yellow Journalism they applied to the McCain marriage when he was a threat to Obama and now the Mitch Daniel's marriage because he is (er...was) a threat to Obama. Obama won by unsealing the secrets of foes' marriages; the NYTimes wants to do that same in 2012Friday, May 13, 2011 at 1:15 pm — admin
Let's face it, Bill Clinton was a scummy husband. So was Newt Gingrich. So are many men. So what. What do I care? It is their policies STUPID. I don't legislate marriages or what goes on between a man and a woman. It is NONE of my business. Obama came to power in a scummy way: by unsealing messy divorce records of two of his opponents--records that both wife and husband wanted to remain sealed. THAT is scummy. What the Republicans did to Clinton was scummy, looking under the hood of his marriage. Scummy. Now the New York Times is Double Scumming Down: |
|