This week at a Smith and Wollensky restaurant I watched the manager of the restaurant upend the bar stool of a women whose only crime was disagreeing with the man who had come up to speak to her. It made me SICK to my stomach to watch this. The woman was with a group of folks and they were having a nice time as far as I could see. The woman had been nursing the same drink for over an hour and the men kept saying "tell us when you are old enough to drink and we'll buy you another glass of wine.' Clearly the woman was not drunk, she was very polite, even friendly.

Surprise, Surprise the NYTimes has a war against women going on. Females who want power are to be demolished. A while back, the NYTimes did a HIT JOB on Meg Witman, painting her as a woman undeserving of public office because she has money--the rich Bi%$h shtick...snore. As if she has not earned every penny. But even more alarming is the sexism and hypocrisy of the HIT JOB the NYTimes did on July 16th to Senate candidate, Linda McMahon.

File this under 2nd Class Citizens: women. The Times, reported this week that Queens prosecutors are charging two young women who swindled old men out of their money after pretending to romance them, with...a hate crime. Really. Elderly men who fell for the absurd idea that young women would want anything but their money. Of course, just try telling a man of a certain age that if a much younger women engages in romance with him it is because of "other" considerations, most often financial considerations in some form or another.

John Tierney is classic LDN: women are just as good as men, except they ain't. What I find most amusing is that the NYTimes allows Tierney to constantly refrain his argument that woman just ain't smartems as the men when it comes to smart stuff like science when it is sooooo easy to refute his premise. Here's slow in the acorn Tierney selling sexism:

That the woman (Missy Maureen Dowd) who wrote this: “unfortunately for Hillary, there’s no White Bitch Month,” and this: “Can Hillary Cry her way back to the White House?,” and this: “While Obama aims to transcend race, Hillary often aims to use gender …to excuse mistakes,” and this: “As a possible first Madame President, Hillary is a flawed science experiment because you can’t take Bill out of the equation. Her story is wrapped up in her marriage…,” and this: “The coda of her campaign has been a primal scream,” and this:

So folks, we've been silent on Kagan. We are happy to see a third women on her way to The Court, BUT with Ginsberg's diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and a shaky outlook for Scary Barry in 2012, our money is on Ginsberg stepping down and then.... only IF Obama appoints another women to take her place will I give him an iota of credit. We most likely will see a return to the 20% rule that is the female condition.

In reading about Kagan, it seems she exactly fits the Obama mold: extremely pro affirmative action and extremely ambivalent or perhaps a bit hostile to abortion rights.

"Eighty percent of Americans, black and white and Asian, have associations that associate women less than men with leadership in business, science and math. You may be aware of some biases you have but less aware of others," Greenwald, a principal investigator for Project Implicit and professor of psychology at the University of Washington, told Black Voices in an interview."~BVBlack Spin

So what up with this finding?? what happens next.....:
From the NYTimes:

"Two thugs were charged with raping an unconscious woman on a West Village park bench, police said yesterday.
A witness told cops the victim was out cold in Jackson Square Park on West Fourth Street at about 11:35 a.m. Monday when the men approached her. She was lying face-down on the bench when one man allegedly got on top of her and took off her pants. Both then raped her, cops said.
The witness called police, and Anthony Torres, 19, who has a previous rape arrest, and Stanley Drayton, 29, were arrested and charged with rape. "