A lesson from the Times: POTUS need not talk to reporters; a KING grants interviews!Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 8:36 pm — admin
Remember how media hated on G. W. for avoiding the media? Remember how media HATED Hillary for avoiding the media early on when she was a front runner? Remember how Obama Girls such as Dowdy and Clift ( and all the other faux feminsts) Loved ON Obama for being so cool and loose with reporters, so jokey, so one of the crowd? The Times did this (link below) soft story on O's media allergies to nudge him out of his zone of protection from hard questions so they can actually ask him some softball questions rather than have Fawning TV anchors bow in his presence or LuV-Struck Oprah fondle him so gently! But note the tone of protection given to Obama throughout this story--painting this as evolving media rather than insulation from hard questions. Oh how funny it is to watch the New York Times flush their own relevance down the toilet to protect THEIR ONE! shame! http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/us/politics/04memo.html?ref=politics |
|
Comments
WTF??!! The NYT story is like
WTF??!! The NYT story is like woman complaining about her cheating husband and in the same breath explaining why he HAD to cheat on her. The NYT just looks silly most days.
Some say he doesn't speak to
Some say he doesn't speak to reporters enough; others say he talks too much. And then there is the truth. If anyone ever finds the balance with this President then, maybe, I'll listen to what he has to say. Or not.
Spot on! It' like watching a
Spot on! It' like watching a train wreck--I can't look away no matter the carnage.
Post new comment