Dear Hillary: It Takes Deferred Gratification NOT my Tax Dollars

Hillary's Hand in Your Pocket and Healthcare.jpg

“I’m more convinced than ever that our future in the 21st century depends on our ability to ensure that a child born in the hills of Appalachia or the Mississippi Delta or the Rio Grande Valley grows up with the same shot at success that [my granddaughter] Charlotte will,” ~Hillary Clinton.

FemiSex says: A) that’s not realistic unless every child born can call you up for a personal job referral, receive a HUGE trust fund, and inherit a political dynasty and power connections.

B) if you really want to assure kids have a really good shot at success then the BEST foundation is to promote Educate BEFORE You Procreate, to woman, and to strongly promote marriage as the foundation that girds against long-term poverty for most women who want children. And let us keep more of the $$ we earn vs. the Big Greedy Hand of Government Taking and Taking and Taking from the producers and giving to those who perpetually live with their hands in other people’s pockets as they crank out babies.

Sadly, the Democrat Party is the party that has done the most damage to the poor since the 60s. Handouts of other people’s money is not and has never been and never will be an answer to entrenched poverty.
Popping out babies that you cannot afford to feed, clothe and house is a BAD IDEA. Republicans get this; Democrats see votes in generational poverty.

PS: ObamaCare still sucks, and you and Obama making my healthcare decisions is and always will be a BAD idea. Taking healthcare away from middleclass producers summarizes ObamaCare. Less Government, more job creation, less taxes, and enough with importing illegal votes.

In response to the above Hillary quote, Dumbest Dowd wrote:

But if Hillary really wants to help those children, maybe she should give them some of the ostensible and obscene $2.5 billion that she is planning to spend to persuade us to make her grandmother of our country.
As a reminder to the Dufus Dowd it was Obama who terminated public financing of presidential elections:

Dufus Maureen Dowd of the Democrat New York Times Never Questioned Why Obama set record amounts of $$$$$$ to get himself elected and ended effective restraints on $$ spent on presidential races, but for a woman, well, for Sexist Dowdy only women need play fair.

Barack Obama's candidacy wasn't just the beginning of the end of public financing. His meteoric fundraising spree rendered the system instantly extinct. Opting out of public financing, despite earlier pledges to the contrary, Obama raised $745 million entirely in private contributions. So much for keeping campaign spending down.

Not once did Missy Dowd call for her Prince and King Obama to give his cash to the poor, nor did she call his infamous break from public financing Obscene. Dowd was too busy putting on lipstick for Obama to notice he’d blown up the campaign finance system. Dowd and Her Double Standards for a black male vs. a white female—NOW THAT’s OBSCENE.


It's not in the common good

It's not in the common good to encourage loafers to loaf and the poor to have more kids than they can afford.
A hallmark of the current middle class is having either no or very few children.
A hallmark of the so-called poor is a litter.

Hillary should've told her daughter to hold off on having kids so her money could better fund a litter of six by an inner city dweller. If you want a new title for Marxism it would be "It takes a village."

Dream of my Father or It takes a Village comes out to that same shit: Big government takes from those who make sensible choices and gives to those who do not.

Hillary was my darling in

Hillary was my darling in 2008. Now? Not so much. She's just borrowed Obama's playbook.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.