Why is the media so invested in covering up for Obama's lies? video

imagesCACB4XSN.jpg

The Leftist Media always knows how to pull the wool over the eyes of the low-information voter. For example, this week the AP reported on a Bipartisan senate report on Benghazi that found Obama and Hillary could have prevented the al-Qaida-linked terrorist attack that happened on the anniversary of 9/11. But in the Leftist reporting of the AP, ever intent on protecting Obama,…

the fact that Obama LIED to the nation repeatedly about the attack and it’s provenance is nicely covered up, Candy Crowley-style.

Read for yourself, from the AP story this week:

Both highly critical and bipartisan, a Senate report declared Wednesday that the deadly assault on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, could have been prevented.

More;
On the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks in the U.S., armed militants stormed the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, setting the building on fire….

The Obama administration first described the assault as a spontaneous mob protest of an anti-Islamic, American-made video. …critics say the administration was reluctant to deal publicly with a terror attack weeks before the presidential election.
Officials corrected their description days after the attack, but by then it had become a hot political issue that has continued to dog the administration.

http://www.sfgate.com/news/world/article/Benghazi-attack-was-preventable...

Ah…Days after the attack, Obama “corrected their description”??? Ha, as if.

From CBSNEWS, dateline, Nov., 27th, (yes, safely AFTER the re-election of Obummer.)

The U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice, defended her early account the attack on the American embassy in Benghazi, responding to critics who say she gave misleading information about the nature of the attack and the motive behind it.

More;

Rice appeared on CBS News' "Face the Nation" five days after the September assault and suggested that there was no evidence the incident was a pre-planned act of terrorism. She said the violence appeared to be a spontaneous flare-up by protesters enraged over an anti-Muslim video posted on YouTube.
The White House later scrapped that theory and said the assault was actually a calculated terrorist attack.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/susan-rice-defends-initial-comments-on-bengh...

---------------------------
So, in reality, DAYS Later, Obama send Susan Rice out to FIVE Sunday morning talk shows to say this:

So the Obama-luvn’ AP is STILL trying this week, to say that “days later” Obama corrected the lie he’d put out that that the attack was not pre-planned, not linked to al- Qaida, and the result of a video.

The New York Times has just LIED to you as well, saying the attack in Benghazi was not linked to al- Qaida.
hahahahahaha, silly Obamaluvn' crap from the Gray Lady DOWN.

And now the AP is STILL trying to tell you Obama stopped lying to you “days later,” when in fact FIVE days later he pushed out Silly Susan on her Silly Season of it was all a video bullshit.

And in fact, then Hillary and Obama, make a video of their own for the Muslim world saying sooooooo sorrrrry about that video that caused you to kill Americans. (but btw, you shouldn’t have killed them even though, wink wink, you have every right to be mad and kill em..)

What Hillary and Obama should have done is say America stands for free speech, and democracy, and if you didn’t like a Utube video, too freakn’ bad, cause free speech is what makes America, America.

Or used to, until Obama used the IRS to quash free speech. (Yes, I do believe that Obama and his MANY visits with the IRS was a part of the scheme to target Tea Party folks with punitive action by the IRS.)
The biggest danger to democracy right now is the Leftist Media --they refuse to tell you the truth. Days later my ASS! And Candy Crowley, oh, no he didn’t call it a terrorist attack with links to al- Qaida, even when he know, hours into the attack al- Qaida was involved and the video was a side show.

From USA Today this week on Senate Report:

A Senate report on the Benghazi attack that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans bolsters Obama administration critics who suspected from the start that al-Qaeda was involved and that it was not a spontaneous protest that went out of control.
The report, released Wednesday by the committee's Democratic majority, said individuals affiliated with groups such as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula were in on the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. compound.

More;
…it started to become clear pretty quickly that this was certainly a terrorist attack and not just not something sporadic."
He said his conclusion was relayed to then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, a member of the White House Cabinet.

But the White House has continued to insist that the nature of the attack was not clear and that was the reason for Obama and Clinton and then-U.N. ambassador Susan Rice saying the attack was the result of a protest over an anti-Islam video by an American filmmaker. Ham said he was not aware of any protest that night and never relayed such information to Washington, according to the declassified testimony.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/01/16/al-qaeda-benghazi-ro...

Obama is a pathological LIAR. We know that, of course. But what we need to understand it the media is now just as psychologically disturbed as Obama.

Comments

Obama is a pathological LIAR.

Obama is a pathological LIAR. We know that, of course. But what we need to understand it the media is now just as psychologically disturbed as Obama.

You sang it sister.
FBI 10 feetup Christie's ass. Obama has his donor investigating his IRS abuses. WTF.

If you speak honestly about

If you speak honestly about your views, the Left will blacklist you. Case in point: http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/01/18/actress-out-of-san-francisco...

Actress Out Of San Francisco Production After Endorsing Tea Party Candidate

Read "Covering up Obama's

Read "Covering up Obama's Gaff's" for more on media covering up for Dumb-O

excellent post!! (fix those

excellent post!!

(fix those typos, please)

The New York Times looks totally stupid now. One week they say no al-Q and then a week later the Democrats in Congress say, oh yes there was al-Q.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

wt